CONTEMPORARY LEGAL HERMENEUTICS: A CRITIQUE OF TRADITIONAL METHODS OF INTERPRETING THE LAW

Elvira Jorovlea; Alina Codreanu; Elvira Jorovlea; Alina Codreanu

doi:10.30888/2663-5712.2026-35-02-096

CONTEMPORARY LEGAL HERMENEUTICS: A CRITIQUE OF TRADITIONAL METHODS OF INTERPRETING THE LAW

Authors

Elvira Jorovlea ASEM https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8184-9951
Alina Codreanu ASEM https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9996-7630

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30888/2663-5712.2026-35-02-096

Keywords:

Legal Hermeneutics, Statutory Interpretation, Legislative Intent, Textualism, Purposivism, Judicial Precedent, Originalism, Interpretive Bias, Postmodern Legal Theory, Digital Legal Hermeneutics

Abstract

The historical evolution of interpretive techniques in legal hermeneutics reveals a rich and dynamic tradition, shaped by the complexities of law throughout the centuries. Early legal interpretation drew inspiration from classical philosophy and religious

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Жоровля, Э., & Codreanu, A. (2026). CONTEMPORARY LEGAL HERMENEUTICS: A CRITIQUE OF TRADITIONAL METHODS OF INTERPRETING THE LAW. SWorldJournal, 2(35-02), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.30888/2663-5712.2026-35-02-096