LEGAL RHETORIC AND PERSUASION IN PLEADINGS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE CONTINENTAL AND COMMON LAW SYSTEMS

Автор(и)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30888/2663-5712.2026-35-02-097

Ключові слова:

Legal Rhetoric, Legal Pleadings, Continental System, Common Law, Binding Precedent, Deductive Logic, Inductive Logic, Legal Storytelling, Ethics in Advocacy, Legal Convergence

Анотація

European legal rhetoric has deep roots in the Roman tradition and classical revival, fundamentally influencing how legal professionals communicate and persuade within modern judicial systems. The article explores the evolution of legal pleadings across tw

Downloads

Опубліковано

2026-01-30

Як цитувати

Жоровля, Э., & Tudor, P. (2026). LEGAL RHETORIC AND PERSUASION IN PLEADINGS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE CONTINENTAL AND COMMON LAW SYSTEMS. SWorldJournal, 2(35-02), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.30888/2663-5712.2026-35-02-097

Номер

№ 35-02 (2026)

Розділ

Статті

Ліцензія

Авторське право (c) 2026 Автори

Creative Commons License

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.